#Focus booster alternative how to#

We don’t spend money on quality lenses, only to have our image quality degraded by putting a bad lens in between our lens and our sensors. Nothing more… Otherwise, the adapter wouldn’t have been built to operate at these apertures. I want to point something out to you that most consumers already know: the Excell+1’s inability to operate at wider f-stops is nothing more than a serious build quality and optical issue. They are further attempting to mislead consumers by separating the Excell+1 from the SpeedBooster by stating that the “Excell+1 spec is f/2.0, f/2.8 or above”, whereas the SpeedBooster can operate at a wider f-stop. The features listed are EXACTLY what the SpeedBooster does, and that is EXACTLY what consumers bought it for. “do a lot of the same things, but at a much more manageable price” “not a competitor and never built to be that' There new video, 'A Closer Look: Fotodiox Excell +1 Focal Reducer & the Metabones Speed Booster', is nothing more than a well-crafted attempt at manipulating people into thinking that the Excell+1 is anything, other than a cheaply made SpeedBooster knockoff. Skip out on this Fotodiox debacle, save yourself a bunch of hassle, pony up the dough for the Metabones Speedbooster, and leave Fotodiox to their shame. This is the exact same scenario for many a while back when the previous adapter turned out to be unusable as well… Instead of getting rid of bad product, they are trying to cleverly re-sell the adapter as a “stylistic lens: Light Canon”… Do they really think that the indie filmmaking and photography market is that stupid? I think not.

#Focus booster alternative how to#

There is no way anyone who knows how to use a camera actually tested these out.īohus puts his name and reputation out there as the face of Fotodiox, and if I was him, I’d be completely ashamed of myself and of Fotodiox right now. This is a “3 strikes your out” scenario for me with Fotodiox… Again, they tricked customers into thinking this 'Excell+1' is a 'new' product and that it's been 'beta tested', which it is completely and utterly false. The BMPCC may have a sensor small enough to avoid the edges of the lens adapter and most of the optical issues but even in the middle it has proven to be no NEARLY as sharp as the Metabones Speedbooster. Blurry, inconsistent images, unusable wide open, and is an utter waste of money and time.

Every test hitting the web right now has proved that this adapter is an optical mess for any M43 camera with a sensor larger than a BMPCC. More info coming soon! Thanks for the good words, everybody!įotodiox fails again. I hope that helps answer some of your questions. But we're always looking for ways around this. We can't do an electronic pass through on this guy, so you'd be stuck mounting a lens who's lens you can't control. So yes - you can take your clicked lens, mount on the Excell, and get declicked style performance.Ĭanon EF is tough because of the electronic aperture. Sadly, there are copycats on ebay that sell under our name - we've heard this story before when we hear about adapters that don't perform up to Fotodiox - it is a declicked aperture control.

This is a new breed of adapters from Fotodiox, a company that's made its bones in the adapter - if you want to get in touch with us on Monday, we can talk about the adapters you've gotten that you're not happy with. Next week we'll publish some demo photos that compare the results of shooting with the Excell + 1 and the MetaBones adapter.

I hope it's okay with your forum rules if I answer a couple of your questions here. Definitely excited that you're interested. Thanks for chatting about the Excell adapters here. Hi everybody! This is Bohus - I'm the guy in the demo videos.